Tesla reportedly uses 3D printed sand moulds for ‘gigacasting,’ large car parts


An auto part printed out of sand using binder jetting (Image Source: ExOne)
Binder jetting is used to print an auto part from sand (Image Source: ExOne).

Sources familiar with Tesla’s production plans have revealed that the company is working on using binder jetting, a special 3D printing technique, to create the sand molds needed for its ‘gigacasting’ process, where a large, complex part such as the underbody is cast as a single piece of metal. The use 3D printing to design the molds will result in a fractional cost and time. It will also allow for more complex designs.

Anyone remotely familiar with 3D printing technology knows its biggest appeal: the ability to design and prototype multiple iterations of a part quickly and at low cost. Tesla, a company known for its innovative approach to solving production problems, hasn’t been blind to the advantages. Recently, we reported about its new ‘gigacasting’ process, which involves casting large, complex car parts as a single piece, instead of stamping and assembling it in several complex and costly steps. The sources who broke this story also detailed the challenges of implementing this new process. And it appears that 3D-printing is at the core of the solution.

Image Source: ExOne
Image Source: ExOne

The reason why manufacturers avoid casting large components is because the sand moldings required are prohibitively pricey to develop. They can cost up 4 million dollars per mold, with each modification adding another $100,000. According to the sources, Tesla has been exploring a 3D printing technique called binder jetting to develop these molds. Binder jet printers are able to produce a complete 3D form by applying a liquid binder layer-by-layer according to the digital design. This is similar to selective laser sintering (SLS), except that a binder agent is used instead of melting to turn the powder into a solid shape.

An ExOne printer being used to create sand molds (Image Source: ExOne)
ExOne printer used to create sand moldings (Image source: ExOne).
De-sanding a finished print (Image Source: ExOne)
De-sanding an finished print (Image source: ExOne).

Each print takes only a few minutes, so prototypes can easily be tweaked. The entire design validation cycle costs just 3% more than the conventional method. The overall development time is also reduced from a year to just two or three month. Tesla plans to leverage another important strength of 3D printing, the possibility of greater complexity in the model, since large structural parts often feature hollow voids to reduce weight and improve crash-performance.

Notably, BMW and Cadillac have already incorporated binder jetting into their development pipeline, using printers from Voxeljet. Similar machines are offered by Desktop Metal’s ExOne. While significant challenges remain in bringing gigacasting to the factory, with Tesla still working out the details, it’s safe to say that 3D printing continues to facilitate innovation across industries in new and unexpected ways.

Buy the ANYCUBIC Photon Mono X2 resin 3D printer on Amazon

Please share our article. Each link counts.



Previous post Report: The Global Smartphone Printers Market is Booming in 2023 | Report Pages 86
Next post EVs Are Simple. Electrifying heavy-duty trucks is more difficult.